SirNameless-gpuser (talk | contribs) (Raised points about possible inaccuracies across the entries for weapons on this wiki, especially pistols.) |
mNo edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I'm pretty sure the damage values are completely incorrect if it is in fact much weaker than the other pistols in the game at the moment (besides the Amphibia S). I don't think this kind of misinformation (or lack of information) is a problem just limited to this weapon's wiki entry, either. I will try researching any hard numbers about this pistol's damage (and perhaps the others as well), but I think that nonetheless there needs to be a "cleanup" of the weapon damage values across the wiki. |
I'm pretty sure the damage values are completely incorrect if it is in fact much weaker than the other pistols in the game at the moment (besides the Amphibia S). I don't think this kind of misinformation (or lack of information) is a problem just limited to this weapon's wiki entry, either. I will try researching any hard numbers about this pistol's damage (and perhaps the others as well), but I think that nonetheless there needs to be a "cleanup" of the weapon damage values across the wiki. |
||
| + | |||
| + | :your welcome to do that and dont forget your signature--[[User:TheBlackDracula|TheBlackDracula]] ([[User talk:TheBlackDracula|talk]]) |
||
== Leak == |
== Leak == |
||
| Line 10: | Line 12: | ||
::Can you actually show me where he stated that it was an accident? This is just the picture that shows the PM-73 and the Makarov's screwed up icon, even though it's quite noticeable. Somehow I doubt that he didn't notice until he posted it, but if you can prove that it was an accident then I'll stop changing the text. --[[User:Chaingunfighter|Chaingunfighter]] ([[User talk:Chaingunfighter|talk]]) 22:22, 1 August 2014 (UTC) |
::Can you actually show me where he stated that it was an accident? This is just the picture that shows the PM-73 and the Makarov's screwed up icon, even though it's quite noticeable. Somehow I doubt that he didn't notice until he posted it, but if you can prove that it was an accident then I'll stop changing the text. --[[User:Chaingunfighter|Chaingunfighter]] ([[User talk:Chaingunfighter|talk]]) 22:22, 1 August 2014 (UTC) |
||
| − | ::: http://www.reddit.com/r/dayz/comments/29ue8r/new_weapon_pm63rak/ciozf63?context=1 Here. now give me a goddarn cookie. --[[User:Basinox|Basinox]] ([[ |
+ | ::: http://www.reddit.com/r/dayz/comments/29ue8r/new_weapon_pm63rak/ciozf63?context=1 Here. now give me a goddarn cookie. --[[User:Basinox|Basinox]] ([[User talk:Basinox|talk]]) 22:29, 1 August 2014 (UTC) |
:::: Fair enough, the cookie is yours :P. Hopefully my skepticism was understandable, though. --[[User:Chaingunfighter|Chaingunfighter]] ([[User talk:Chaingunfighter|talk]]) 16:21, 2 August 2014 (UTC) |
:::: Fair enough, the cookie is yours :P. Hopefully my skepticism was understandable, though. --[[User:Chaingunfighter|Chaingunfighter]] ([[User talk:Chaingunfighter|talk]]) 16:21, 2 August 2014 (UTC) |
||
Latest revision as of 06:39, 7 February 2019
Damage Values[]
I'm pretty sure the damage values are completely incorrect if it is in fact much weaker than the other pistols in the game at the moment (besides the Amphibia S). I don't think this kind of misinformation (or lack of information) is a problem just limited to this weapon's wiki entry, either. I will try researching any hard numbers about this pistol's damage (and perhaps the others as well), but I think that nonetheless there needs to be a "cleanup" of the weapon damage values across the wiki.
- your welcome to do that and dont forget your signature--TheBlackDracula (talk)
Leak[]
Accidental leak? There's no inclination that it was accidental. If it's in a dev screenshot then it's better to assume that it was intended rather than assume it was accidental, unless the dev states so themselves (which Chris Torchia did not). Besides that, Chris Torchia had already revealed that they were working on the Makarov, so it's not really leaked, unless you consider the model itself. Yet still, revealed is a more ambiguous term and can apply to either, so it's better to say "revealed" rather than "accidentally leaked" because leaking is always unintentional whereas revealing can be either intentional or unintentional. --Chaingunfighter (talk) 01:46, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
- Chris stated it was a accident as he forgot to toggle the hotbar for the screenshot. The shot was supposed to be sneak peak of the rak. https://twitter.com/ctorchia/status/485064544621178881/photo/1 --Basinox (talk) 06:07, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
- Can you actually show me where he stated that it was an accident? This is just the picture that shows the PM-73 and the Makarov's screwed up icon, even though it's quite noticeable. Somehow I doubt that he didn't notice until he posted it, but if you can prove that it was an accident then I'll stop changing the text. --Chaingunfighter (talk) 22:22, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
- http://www.reddit.com/r/dayz/comments/29ue8r/new_weapon_pm63rak/ciozf63?context=1 Here. now give me a goddarn cookie. --Basinox (talk) 22:29, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
- Fair enough, the cookie is yours :P. Hopefully my skepticism was understandable, though. --Chaingunfighter (talk) 16:21, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
- Ofcourse. One can never be careful enough with information. --Basinox (talk) 16:32, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
Attachments[]
The article states that the gun "can not take any attachments", but on the weapons page a Pistol Flashlight is listed as an attachment for it. --AnotherArk (talk) 10:39, 5 November 2014 (UTC)